<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Long Range Shooter &#187; Uncategorized</title>
	<atom:link href="http://longrangeshooter.com/category/uncategorized/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://longrangeshooter.com</link>
	<description>A Long Range and Distance Shooting Website</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 03:11:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Benchmark&#8217;s two-groove .308&#8243; Barrel</title>
		<link>http://longrangeshooter.com/2012/01/benchmarks-two-groove-308-barrel/</link>
		<comments>http://longrangeshooter.com/2012/01/benchmarks-two-groove-308-barrel/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 03:11:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lucas Beitner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://longrangeshooter.com/?p=997</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Benchmark’s two-groove .308” barrel The History Rifle barrels with only two grooves are nothing new. As near as I can tell the Lee-Enfield was the first to employ two groove barrels (at least for high power rifle cartridges).  They apparently conducted a test in May, of 1941, where they fired 500 rounds through a five [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><strong>Benchmark’s two-groove .308” barrel</strong></div>
<div><strong><br />
</strong></div>
<div><strong>The History</strong></div>
<div><strong><br />
</strong></div>
<div>Rifle barrels with only two grooves are nothing new. As near as I can tell the Lee-Enfield was the first to employ two groove barrels (at least for high power rifle cartridges).  They apparently conducted a test in May, of 1941, where they fired 500 rounds through a five groove and a two groove, accuracy testing with the barrel hot, and checking for fouling and barrel wear. The conclusion was that there was no significant difference in accuracy, fouling, or wear. The reason they went to the two groove was an apparent advantage in the ease and speed of manufacturing barrels with fewer lands and grooves.  Remington later conducted some of its own testing with favorable results, showing accuracy equivalency at closer ranges and if anything. superior accuracy for the two-groove at longer range (see references). The Springfield 03-A3 apparently followed suit in using two groove barrels for the same reasons.</div>
<div>When rifling is made by pushing or pulling a button there is no cost or speed of manufacturing advantage with one rifling layout over another. In rim fire competition, there is believed to be an advantage in two groove barrels with respect to wind drift. Benchmark Barrels has been making two groove rim fire barrels for many years, and they’ve had great success, setting more than a few world records along the way. Ron Sinnema (owner of Benchmark) decided he wanted to try a two groove barrel for center fire rifles. So, he ordered  a two groove button for .308” 1:10 twist. He thought there may be possible advantages in wind drift, fouling, or barrel wear. There also was a chance that it would not shoot well with only two grooves. The accuracy standards of aftermarket barrel manufacturers today are much more stringent than what the old Lee-Enfield military rifles were held to,. The fact that two groove barrels seemed to match the accuracy of the five groove barrels in British military tests is almost irrelevant.</div>
<div></div>
<div></div>
<div></div>
<div></div>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<div><strong>The Build</strong></div>
<div><strong><br />
</strong></div>
<div>The 2011 Oregon Sniper Challenge had been caliber restricted to 308 win, and 223 Rem. Ron and I had participated the previous year, but neither of us had 308’s (I‘ve had more than a few, but none at the time). I did have a 30 cal. 3 groove 1:11 twist Benchmark barrel I’d purchased a year before for a 300 win mag project that never came to fruition. I also had a Mark X commercial mauser action, a cracked CZ 750 stock that I planned to repair and re-inlet for the mauser action. I had a custom built detachable box magazine system made by Randy Ketchum (owner of Lynnwood Gun) that used Accuracy International long action magazines. Ron decided to pass on attempting to sign up for the match this year. I decided I would have the above components made into a 308 win. When I told Ron my plans he remembered that he’d made a two-groove barrel, and had yet to test one and see how it would work. It was then decided that my “odd duck” mauser project be used to test the two groove benchmark barrel.  Coincidentally, all this happened 70 years after the Enfield test… to the month! This particular build was definitely not an ideal test platform, but with a trued action, good bedding, and a precise chamber job, we had no reason not to expect solid accuracy.<a href="http://longrangeshooter.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/IMG_0797.jpg"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-1015" src="http://longrangeshooter.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/IMG_0797-600x400.jpg" alt="" width="600" height="400" /></a></div>
<div>The actual build went faster than I could have expected. The barrel came out to a handy 23 inches. I went with a reasonably heavy custom contour we affectionately refer to as the “Jack Ass Contour”. It was designed by a buddy  for long range “practical“ matches (we told him he should name it… he was joking, but the name stuck).  It’s 1.250” for the first 5” it tapers to .900” at 14”  and from there, it tapers to .780 at 30” (AKA: Stuurmans’ modified palma). The stock was repaired, the custom DBM was working great. I expected an accurate, functional, match rifle. I also expected the rifle to be a little schizophrenic in nature due to the hodge-podge of parts I collected for the build. This was not the case. The parts worked together almost flawlessly. The CZ 750 stock looks as if it was always meant for that action. It is an excellent design, very similar to the AICS which I’m very familiar with. For straight up ergonomics the CZ stock is better in some ways. The thumbhole is slightly more comfortable and placed farther from the trigger (one of the few issues I have with the AICS), the drop near the magazine well is deeper, and I prefer the  feeling of textured composites over the plastic feel of the AICS. The cheek piece design and butt-pad are inferior to the AICS but I modified the butt-pad. Of course the AICS is much tougher, but the CZ stock is much lighter. The AICS mags used in my custom DBM stick just below the mag well, I’d rather be flush, but it works out very well and is easy to install and remove magazines. There are stops built in, so the magazine cannot rub against the bolt. The trigger sits farther back than would be ideal so I planned to modify the trigger shoe, but never got around to it. I was accustomed to it quickly anyway.</div>
<div> <a href="http://longrangeshooter.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/003.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-1016" src="http://longrangeshooter.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/003-600x400.jpg" alt="" width="600" height="400" /></a></div>
<div><strong>Field Testing</strong></div>
<div><strong><br />
</strong></div>
<div>As soon as I got the rifle in my hands I got the  load testing under way. I planned to use 155gr SMK Palma bullets and shoot them at a good clip (over 2800fps) with Winchester cases full of Varget, and CCI BR-2’s. I couldn’t  find any 155 SMK’s locally but I did find Berger 155 VLD’s. I couldn’t (or wouldn’t) wait, so I started load development. I always run “Optimal Charge Weight” loads. The high OCW for this combo came out to 47.2gr of Varget. This netted me 2840fps in the 23” barrel.  Accuracy testing put out groups between 1.25” to 1.6” at 300yds for 5 shots (prone off bi-pod).  I was getting better accuracy with 175gr SMK’s over 42.5gr of Varget, but I was after the better ballistics offered by the light sleek 155gr bullets. I decided to try out a few 155gr Lapua Scenars I had collecting dust in the reloading room. With the same load of 47.2gr of Varget and the BR-2 primers accuracy improved. The rifle was now grouping between .8” and 1.25” in good conditions at 300yds (also prone/bi-pod). I was very pleased with these results. I double checked that I was still in the OCW and it was. I felt confident this load would shoot well in a wide variety of temperatures and conditions. The more we took this rifle out for long range testing the more confidence grew. It became obvious fairly quickly the rifle was excellent, the slight stress associated with “testing” wore away and “two-groove” became the punch line. “I told you two-grooves shoot great from improvised rests”…. “You probably don’t have to hold for wind at all with the… two-groove”…. “Heck no, I’m not going to clean it, it’s a two-groove. Remember?”<a href="http://longrangeshooter.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/002.jpg"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-1017" src="http://longrangeshooter.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/002-600x400.jpg" alt="" width="600" height="400" /></a></div>
<div>Not long after finding the above load I took the rifle to a long range match. The Big Wheels Steel Challenge would give me an opportunity to run the test rifle with “experimental” barrel out to 1300yds! Before the match I checked my drops out to 1330yds with Ron Sinnema and Chris Marti. Ron brought his 243 shooting the 115 DTAC’s and Chris brought a 7wsm shooting 168gr Berger VLD’s. There’s no arguing the superior wind drift of the 243 and the 7wsm, but we were all surprised by the 308’s accuracy at such distance. My particular load would be fully sub-sonic by the time it reached the rock we were shooting at. Even still the 308 was easily the most accurate of the three. We didn’t shoot at paper so I will not speculate on exact group size, but I can honestly say, I’ve never witnessed a 308 hold that kind of vertical dispersion beyond 1100yds. I’m sure some have achieved similar results with 210gr Berger VLD’s or 208gr A-max, but it was more than surprising from a 155gr bullet. At the Match (BSC) the rifle performed flawlessly all the way through. I managed to take 3rd place, and was the highest scoring 308 by a long ways. I managed to clean more than a few stages.  The longest stage (1250yds and 1300yds) were dropped from the score but I did hit both targets (neither with first round). I don’t believe dropping the score on that stage would help or hurt enough to make a difference although I did out-score the match winner on that stage, a buddy who was shooting 115gr DTAC’s at just over 2900fps (also a Benchmark Barrel). Then came the Oregon Sniper Challenge. Things didn’t go so well at this match. The rifle shot great all the way though but my score on the first stage took the wind out of my sails to say the least. Although shooting a perfect score (200pts) shooter and spotter switched scores so I was awarded only 60pts. This would be fine had we suffered a communication issue (what they were apparently attempting to score), but unfortunately the shooter I was partnered with didn’t have a proper zero. The highlight of OSC for the rifle and I was the long range stage (800yds). We had to shoot 10 shots with no sighters at a silhouette. I had the 3rd highest score on the stage 85pts out of 100, the highest score was 89pts. I could have scored better but I  hedged my bets by shooting the last 3 shots held progressively farther into the wind than what I felt was correct. If I’d have been wrong with my original wind call, it would have salvaged the stage and allowed me a few points where I may not have scored otherwise.</div>
<div></div>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<div><strong>Breaking It Down</strong></div>
<div><strong><br />
</strong></div>
<div>By now I have over 750 rounds through this two-groove 1:10 twist Benchmark Barrel. Does it work? Absolutely! I have been very impressed with this rifle from the beginning. So here’s my final analysis on the “two-groove”…..</div>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<div><strong>-Accuracy </strong></div>
<div><strong></strong>with two grooves: This rifle is very accurate. I would not expect any improvement in accuracy at any range with a more traditional 3-groove, 5-groove or what have you. I shot one group at just over 650yds that was just under 2.6” for 5 shots.  Had I shot more that one group at that distance, I’m sure some would be better and some would be worse, but there’s no doubt the rifle consistently displays excellent accuracy. I’m still curious if the unusual long range subsonic accuracy I observed with this rifle could be attributed to the two-groove barrel.</div>
<div></div>
<div></div>
<div><strong>-Wind drift</strong></div>
<div><strong></strong>with two grooves: Unfortunately I have not seen any significant advantage in wind drift with the two-groove layout. The bullet drifts about what the drop chart says it will. I would guess that when a bullet is super-sonic the grooves cut into the bullet don’t  effect bullet flight much, if at all. If one was to test this design subsonic, it may display the same advantages many observe in rim-fire.</div>
<div></div>
<div></div>
<div><strong>-Fouling</strong></div>
<div><strong></strong>with two grooves: This barrel has always been very easy to clean. Copper fouling is on par with other hand-lapped Benchmark’s  I’ve owned (very little copper fouling). I will say that powder fouling does seem to be better with this design. When I entered the BSC match I already had over 200 rounds through it without cleaning. Looking down the barrel with the naked eye you’d never know it.</div>
<div></div>
<div></div>
<div><strong>-Barrel Wear</strong></div>
<div>with two grooves: Had we chambered the barrel in 300 Ultra Mag, we could have assessed barrel wear. But a 308 win is very easy on barrels as it is. I would not be supprised if barrel wear would be reduced by having less lands and grooves but I have no way of knowing conclusively either way at this time.</div>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<div>The ultimate question is, would I use a two-groove instead of three or five grooves. I honestly would. As did the British when testing the two-groove, I see no down side. They seem to powder foul less, the barrel may last longer, there is no degradation of accuracy, there may be advantages when shooting sub-sonic. So without a doubt I would use a two-groove again. The 1:10 twist is a little faster than I would choose for 155gr bullets but it worked perfectly.  I think the 1:10 two-groove would be ideal for a custom 308’s and 30-06’s used for shooting heavy bullets over 200gr. I believe that would be the niche for this particular barrel (although with my results I’d run it in a 308 w/155’s too!) Ron believes the two-groove may be a little harder on bullet jackets so a 300 ultra mag shooting bullets at high MV’s may be better served by a 5r style rifling. I’ve always liked to use something a little different… You probably realized this when I described the custom Mauser that would become the test bed of the two-groove. I have a feeling though, that a few years from now the two-groove may not be nearly as “different” as it is now. I look forward to seeing the results of others with this design.</div>
<div></div>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<div>I want to Thank Ron Sinnema and the rest of the Benchmark crew for making this build possible. I also want to thank Randy Ketchum for an excellent custom DBM. Thanks to Jeff Gay and Steve Huisman for putting on some great matches. I had allot of fun with this rifle and will continue to enjoy it in the future.</div>
<div></div>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<div>By Lucas Beitner</div>
<div></div>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<div>References:</div>
<div>The Lee-Enfield Rifle&#8221;, Major E.G.B Reynolds</div>
<div><a title="http://www.remingtonsociety.com/rsa/journals/two-groove" href="http://www.remingtonsociety.com/rsa/journals/two-groove" target="_blank">http://www.remingtonsociety.com/rsa/journals/two-groove</a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://longrangeshooter.com/2012/01/benchmarks-two-groove-308-barrel/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Target Cam</title>
		<link>http://longrangeshooter.com/2011/07/target-cam/</link>
		<comments>http://longrangeshooter.com/2011/07/target-cam/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2011 00:49:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean Pomerinke</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://longrangeshooter.com/?p=946</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So, have you ever wondered why long range shooters like to shoot at steel so much? Yes there is something enticing about seeing your target react to your bullet, but there is a greater underlining reason. With steel, you have a way of telling that you have in fact hit the target.  Now I know [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, have you ever wondered why long range shooters like to shoot at steel so much?  Yes there is something enticing about seeing your target react to your bullet, but there is a greater underlining reason.  With steel, you have a way of telling that you have in fact hit the target.   Now I know that there are a lot of companies out there that claim that their spotting/rifle scope can see a bullet hole at 1,000 yards.  I have looked through a lot of scopes over the years, including Schmidt &amp; Bender, Night Force and March Scopes.   But I have yet to look through one that I have not had a hard time discerning exactly where the bullet hit or telling someone that they could easily do that unless they were shooting a 50 cal.   Now what if I told you that there is a way you can see a bullet hole from a .243 at 1,000 yards.   Not only during the day, but also see the bullet hole at NIGHT.  Well, there is a way now!  Mark Kuss, the developer of the <a href="http://www.target-cam.com/"> Target Cam</a>, has the solution.  He has come up with a wireless camera and hand held monitor that can has a range of up to 1,000 yards.  When Mark first contacted me the timing couldn&#8217;t have been better for me, I was just getting my new rifle back from my gunsmith.  I had turned my Remington 300 Ultra Mag into a .338 and was going to need to develop my bullet drop all over again.  Now, even though the timing was good for me,  it was not good for mother nature yet as we had a slow start into spring.  I guess that&#8217;s how the cookie crumbles sometimes.  As I got chances to go out and shoot,  I found it to be really handy not only at long distances but even during the load development stage.  It doesn&#8217;t take long for it to be difficult to distinguish between your last shot and shots you made earlier.  With the <a href="http://www.target-cam.com/">Target Cam</a> and the dry erase pen you get,  I could mark each shot on the screen and keep track of the earlier shots.  It made it easier to track to your POA (Point of Aim) .  I know some of you guys came here to hear about the distance stuff, so I started my first bullet drop testing at 500 yards.  The<a href="http://longrangeshooter.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/DSC_0184.jpg"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-947" title="DSC_0184" src="http://longrangeshooter.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/DSC_0184-600x401.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="201" /></a> setup is pretty simple,  start by setting up your target and getting the camera set at the appropriate distance to the target and a bit off to one side.  For obvious reasons, you don&#8217;t want your camera in front of your target and if you have to ask why, then you probably shouldn&#8217;t have a rifle anyway.  Now after you get the camera setup,  it&#8217;s time to setup the antenna.  When I first attempted to get a signal, I had a hard time getting it to work much past 500 yards.  I called Mark and he reminded  me that it is a directional antenna and that it works best if you have two guys with radios or a <a href="http://longrangeshooter.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/DSC_01831.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-959" title="DSC_0183" src="http://longrangeshooter.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/DSC_01831-600x401.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="201" /></a>cell phone ( one at the target and one at the FFP  &#8220;field firing position&#8221; ) and adjust it to get the line of sight correct.  Like anything else that sends a signal,  it only works as good as the terrain/weather will allow.  So keep that in mind when you are trying to setup your target in areas that have lots of brush or shrubs.  So now that everything is setup,  it&#8217;s time for my favorite part.  Now for you guys out there that are as serious as a shooter as I am, I like to keep notes of just about everything.  With a laptop you can connect your Target Cam monitor  to <a href="http://longrangeshooter.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/DSCN0531.jpg"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-965" title="DSCN0531" src="http://longrangeshooter.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/DSCN0531-600x450.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="201" /></a>your laptop and record your video, then take it home with you for review.   So with a little help from my ballistic software to get me in the ball park, it was time to put the rubber-to-the-road and see how well the new gun and the new Target Cam were going to perform.  Now in the video you&#8217;ll see my very first shot nail the bullseye which i&#8217;ll admit, there may have been some luck in that!  Even if you had a scope that could see the bullet hole, there is no way you would&#8217;ve been able to see the bullet hole in the black and you would have</p>
<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="400" height="301" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="flashvars" value="file=http%3A%2F%2Fvid1232.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fff374%2FPomerinke%2FProduce.mp4" /><param name="src" value="http://static.photobucket.com/player.swf" /><param name="wmode" value="transparent" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="400" height="301" src="http://static.photobucket.com/player.swf" allowfullscreen="true" wmode="transparent" flashvars="file=http%3A%2F%2Fvid1232.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fff374%2FPomerinke%2FProduce.mp4"></embed></object></p>
<p>thought that you missed the target completely without getting closer to verify.  All in all, I have to say I am pretty happy with how the gun and the Target Cam are doing.  Even knowing exactly where the bullets holes went, I tried to spot them through my 24 power scope and it wasn&#8217;t going to happen.  I even tried to see the bullet holes through my shooting partner Calib&#8217;s 32 power scope, no dice.  So now that we&#8217;d broken the ice on the Target Cam, we wanted to see if it could get all the way out to 1,000 yards.  We put up a fresh target and headed out.<br />
<object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="400" height="301" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="flashvars" value="file=http%3A%2F%2Fvid1232.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fff374%2FPomerinke%2FProduce-1.mp4" /><param name="src" value="http://static.photobucket.com/player.swf" /><param name="wmode" value="transparent" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="400" height="301" src="http://static.photobucket.com/player.swf" allowfullscreen="true" wmode="transparent" flashvars="file=http%3A%2F%2Fvid1232.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fff374%2FPomerinke%2FProduce-1.mp4"></embed></object><br />
Once we got out there, the signal did come in but was a bit in and out. Which is not surprising, as we did not make any adjustments to the antenna and it was very hot that day. The mirage was horrid.  I am not sure if the mirage could interrupt the signal or not, but it wouldn&#8217;t surprise if it had.  <a href="http://longrangeshooter.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/DSCN0687.jpg"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-974" title="DSCN0687" src="http://longrangeshooter.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/DSCN0687-600x450.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="201" /></a>Now that we had done some daytime shooting it was time to see how it worked at night and it just so happens that my shooting partner has a .243 with a night vision scope on it.  I have never shot at night before and it was a bit of a learning curve for me, but I did enjoy being able to shoot at 11:30 pm.  The only problem we encountered was the the black circles we put on the target which disappeared through the night vision scope, so we had to do some guessing on where to hold.<br />
<object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="400" height="301" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="flashvars" value="file=http%3A%2F%2Fvid1232.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fff374%2FPomerinke%2FProduce2.mp4" /><param name="src" value="http://static.photobucket.com/player.swf" /><param name="wmode" value="transparent" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="400" height="301" src="http://static.photobucket.com/player.swf" allowfullscreen="true" wmode="transparent" flashvars="file=http%3A%2F%2Fvid1232.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fff374%2FPomerinke%2FProduce2.mp4"></embed></object><br />
So here is the true statement on the Target Cam; not only could we easily see the bullet holes from a .243, but it also allowed us to see them at night.   So you hear all this and it sounds great but wait, there&#8217;s more.  That monitor can handle up to 4 different cameras at once, in split screen or one at a time where you can switch through each camera.  I took this out with my last class at the time of writing this. It was really nice being able to give instant and accurate corrections for students and if I had more cameras, that would just make things all that much better.  Mark has 2 different models currently available for you to buy. The TC-100 which has a range up to 300 yards and the LR-1000 that has a range up to 1,000 yards.  Now even though the LR-1000 is given a max range of 1,000 yards, we were able to squeeze a bit more out of it getting it out to 1,300 yards using taller pole on the antenna.  You can find Mark and the Target Cam system at <a href="http://target-cam.com/">http://target-cam.com/</a> and for anyone that is serious about shooting long range, they would be very pleased with the target cam system as I am.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://longrangeshooter.com/2011/07/target-cam/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>HorusVision</title>
		<link>http://longrangeshooter.com/2011/01/horusvision/</link>
		<comments>http://longrangeshooter.com/2011/01/horusvision/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Jan 2011 01:57:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean Pomerinke</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://longrangeshooter.com/?p=727</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Everyone that has used ballistic software in the past knows the steps that need to be taken in making that first round hit.  You get your range finder out your Kestrel your PDA probably your note book so you can make that shot right the first time.  Then one day someone puts it all together [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://longrangeshooter.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/longrangeshooter.com_1.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-729" title="longrangeshooter.com" src="http://longrangeshooter.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/longrangeshooter.com_1-213x500.jpg" alt="" width="213" height="500" /></a></p>
<p>Everyone that has used ballistic software in the past knows the steps that need to be taken in making that first round hit.  You get your range finder out your Kestrel your PDA probably your note book so you can make that shot right the first time.  Then one day someone puts it all together and now we have the the Kestrel 4500NV and ATrag Ballistics software together in one unit.  Now with this unit your ballistic software gets your atmospheric conditions automatically with out the need to input the data manually.  Humidity, Temperature,  Station or Barometric pressure and Wind being updated in real time so that its ready before you are.  Here is the press release on the new product that you will be seeing soon&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;</p>
<div id="_mcePaste">
<p style="text-align: center;"><strong>HORUS BALLISTICS SOFTWARE AND KESTREL WEATHER TRACKER ARE NOWTOGETHER IN ONE UNIT</strong></p>
<p><strong> </strong><br />
Horus Vision has teamed with Kestrel Weather Meters to introduce the Horus Kestrel, acompact ballistics instrument for long-range shooting.<br />
SAN BRUNO, CA…Horus Vision, the leader of long-range shooting innovation, hasteamed up with Kestrel Weather Meters to introduce the breakthrough Horus Kestrel-the first device to incorporate weather (atmospherics) data directly into ballisticssolutions in real-time.<br />
The relationship between Horus and Kestrel kindled as a response for the military’smission to obtain consolidated gear to minimize redundancy and bulk. All the powerof ATrag Ballistics is now integrated in the four-ounce pocket sized Kestrel WeatherTracker, eliminating the need for a separate piece of gear (which comes with a numberof accessories you would have to lug around, as well).<br />
This integrated Kestrel 4500NV unit features five customizable targets, an extensivegun list, and Horus’ proprietary truing technology. This pairing is only offered in the4500 model as it is the only one that is capable of collecting wind direction &#8211; which iscrucial for long-range shooting. The Night Vision (NV) series is the preferred modelfor the military because of its dim red back light that does not obscure or bleach outyour natural vision in low light situations. The Horus Kestrel comes in two colors- OliveDrab and Desert Tan, and is IP67 and MIL-STD-810G Rugged. All compacted into ahand sized unit that takes two AAA batteries- no chargers, plugs, or over-sized energy sources.<br />
Horus and Kestrel are prime candidates for this type of integration, because both arewell-known and highly respected in the military and government communities. Bothproducts have seen extensive action overseas and are relied upon in the daily lives ofthe sniper community.  The Horus Kestrel will be available early in 2011, following SHOT Show, and will be available to purchase on both Horus Vision and Kestrel websites. Preliminary suggested price is around $739, the Horus Kestrel is less than a PDA with ATrag and Kestrel Combo.</p>
<p><strong>About Horus Vision</strong></p>
<p>Horus Vision provides cutting-edge technology to improve rifle accuracy at extended ranges, increasing the likelihood of a first-round hit. Horus products reduce the need for manual scope manipulation and mental calculation and incorporate sophisticated ballistics calculations. Our patented reticle replaces traditional mil-dot reticles. Horus technology and designs deliver simplified, systemized shooting that make expert skill possible and improve accuracy at any distance. Our hardware is combat-proven, meets military standards and can withstand the most rugged conditions. Horus Vision&#8217;s ballistics calculations were developed and refined by the former Chief of ARDEC&#8217;s small-arms division, William C. Davis. Horus Vision was founded in 2000 and is headquartered in San Bruno, California.</p>
<p><strong>For more information about Horus Vision:</strong></p>
<p>Contact Liz Hyman at (650) 588-8862 x1002</p>
<p>Liz@horusvision.com</p>
<p>www.horusvision.com</p>
<p>www.kestrelweather.com</p>
<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="640" height="385" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/KQmBjO8VBmc?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="640" height="385" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/KQmBjO8VBmc?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://longrangeshooter.com/2011/01/horusvision/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Berger Bullets NEW 338 300gr Hybrid</title>
		<link>http://longrangeshooter.com/2010/05/berger-bullets-new-338-300gr-vld/</link>
		<comments>http://longrangeshooter.com/2010/05/berger-bullets-new-338-300gr-vld/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 03:20:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean Pomerinke</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://longrangeshooter.com/?p=695</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have been waiting a long time for Berger to release this bullet and it is now possible to purchase. I am not spending a lot of time on this post but I wanted to get it out there for everyone to see.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been waiting a long time for Berger to release this bullet and it is now possible to purchase.  I am not spending a lot of time on this post but I wanted to<br />
get it out there for everyone to see.</p>
<p><a href="http://longrangeshooter.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/338-hybrid-1.gif"><img src="http://longrangeshooter.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/338-hybrid-1.gif" alt="" title="338-hybrid-1" width="360" height="310" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-698" /></a></p>
<p><object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/f1iIJeFGhnU&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1&#038;"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/f1iIJeFGhnU&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1&#038;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://longrangeshooter.com/2010/05/berger-bullets-new-338-300gr-vld/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Interview with Carlos Hathcock &#8220;White Feather&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://longrangeshooter.com/2010/04/interview-with-carlos-hathcock-white-feather/</link>
		<comments>http://longrangeshooter.com/2010/04/interview-with-carlos-hathcock-white-feather/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2010 02:28:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean Pomerinke</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://longrangeshooter.com/?p=685</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is a video that I came across of a Interview of Carlos Hathcock. He was a sniper in the Vietnam War and later help setup the sniper schools that we use today. He has won numerous competitions including the Wimbledon cup and held the longest recorded kill in 1967 of 2,286 meters (2,500 yards, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a video that I came across of a Interview of Carlos Hathcock.<br />
He was a sniper in the Vietnam War and later help setup the sniper schools that we use today.  He has won numerous competitions including the Wimbledon cup and held the longest recorded kill in 1967 of 2,286 meters (2,500 yards, or 1.42 miles) until it was beat by Arron Perry and then Rob Furlong&#8217;s record of 2,430 meters (2,657 yd / 1.509 miles)  </p>
<p><object width="640" height="468"><param name="movie" value="http://www.megavideo.com/v/4HO3H6ZI968bbe1e5cc2c2702b9c9c8c763353ad"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.megavideo.com/v/4HO3H6ZI968bbe1e5cc2c2702b9c9c8c763353ad" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="640" height="468"></embed></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://longrangeshooter.com/2010/04/interview-with-carlos-hathcock-white-feather/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Savage Arms cutting edge sniper weapon system.</title>
		<link>http://longrangeshooter.com/2010/03/savage-arms-cutting-edge-sniper-weapon-system/</link>
		<comments>http://longrangeshooter.com/2010/03/savage-arms-cutting-edge-sniper-weapon-system/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2010 02:15:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean Pomerinke</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Product Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://longrangeshooter.com/?p=633</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When the Philippine needed a sniper rifle to confront their local Al-Qaeda affiliates, they bypassed the expensive European arms and selected a bolt gun familiar to any American deer hunter. The modern Savage bolt-action series, always among the most reasonably priced of this type, has most recently become highly regarded among long-range high power competitors [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When the Philippine needed a sniper rifle to confront their local Al-Qaeda affiliates, they bypassed the expensive European arms and selected a bolt gun familiar to any American deer hunter. The modern Savage bolt-action series, always among the most reasonably priced of this type, has most recently become highly regarded among long-range high power competitors for its superb accuracy. </p>
<p>                                              Savage Model 110<br />
<a href="http://longrangeshooter.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/savage-110-ba.jpg"><img src="http://longrangeshooter.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/savage-110-ba.jpg" alt="" title="savage-110-ba" width="425" height="112" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-670" /></a></p>
<p>Patent-type drawings, dated 1892, demonstrate that Arthur W. Savage designed the first rotary-magazine, lever-action repeating rifle. Hammerless and with a solid breech, the rifle&#8217;s rotary magazine was similar to the Mannlicher design of 1887. It was actuated by a bar-lever also serving as a trigger guard.  It was Savage&#8217;s intent that his design would serve as a military firearm. He was unsuccessful in doing so, but was granted a patent on 7 February 1893. The rifle was introduced as the Model 1895. After some changes were made, the Savage Arms Company introduced the Model 1899, which was to become the company&#8217;s mainstay for many decades.  In 1958 the Savage Arms Corporation introduced the Model 110 bolt-action rifle. While not entirely novel and basically a Mauser type, the Model 110 has several internal features never used before in a turnbolt design. The Savage Model 110 action was designed by Nicholas Brewer. Brewer&#8217;s action is reliable, economical, easy to operate and easy to disassemble</p>
<p>It forms the basis for the Savage caliber .308 Win. Model 10FCP 308 WIN HS PREC sniper rifle sent to SHOTGUN NEWS for test and evaluation. In addition to their extensive line of sporting rifles, the Savage Arms, Inc. markets an extensive line of sniper rifles for law enforcement applications with stocks from H-S Precision, Choate or McMillan. They are economical, incredibly accurate and both rugged and reliable.  These rifles have already been fielded successfully in operations with the Special Action Force, which is the main counter-terrorism unit of the PNP. </p>
<p>The PNP-SAF model has a barrel with a precisely machined taper and thread to accommodate an Ops-Inc. sound suppressor.  The PNP-SAF rifle is equipped with a four-round, single-position-feed, staggered-column, detachable box magazine. This is a seldom encountered, but decidedly valuable feature on a tactical turnbolt, as it provides the operator with an instantly available potential for a greater supply of ammunition and also a selection during an operation of alternative specialty ammunition types. </p>
<p>Overall length of the Model 10FCP 308 WIN HS PREC sniper rifle sent to SGN is 45.5 inches (1155.7mm). The 22-inch (558.8mm) Savage heavy barrel has six grooves with a 1:10 right-hand twist. It is fully free floating. The weight, empty, is 9 pounds (4.08 kg). The exterior finish is a matte, shot-blast, black oxide. </p>
<p>The Savage PNP-SAF rifle sells for $1,330 without the bipod. Anyone wanting a rifle exactly like this with the barrel threaded for the Elite Iron sound suppressor and equipped with a thread protector can go through the Savage special-order department, as it is not a catalogued item.  The H-S Precision Pro-Series stock is composed of woven Kevlar and fiberglass cloth, uni-directional carbon fiber, with an epoxy-based gel coat and laminating resin. It features reaction injection molded (machine mixed) polyurethane foam that has been fiberglass reinforced.  The stock has a high comb that was designed to interface with optical sights equipped with the large objective lenses popular with law enforcement and military snipers without the need for a padded or extended cheekpiece, although for the PNP-SAF contract it was fitted with an excellent Karsten adjustable cheekpiece.  An important characteristic of this stock is a proprietary CNC-machined aluminum bedding block chassis system, designed by H-S Precision, which results in an extremely stable and rugged bedding system. The stock is equipped with a rugged rubber recoil pad. </p>
<p>The model 110 receivers start as a large diameter bar of aircraft-quality steel alloy or stainless steel. Bars are cut and gun-drilled, as are the barrels, and then are turned to final diameter and concentricity. Next, five broaches are pulled to change the hole from round to a shape that matches the bolt head. After a few operations on heavy milling machines, the receivers pass through a line of CNC vertical machining centers to machine finish all the critical dimensions. The receivers are induction hardened in a computer-controlled machine that utilizes a robot to load the parts for hardening. </p>
<p>Induction hardening generates heat by holding the part inside a coil that generates a magnetic field with high frequency alternating current, which causes the field to reverse with every cycle. The molecules of steel are pushed and pulled in the field so fast that they rub against each other and the resulting friction generates heat. The entire hardening process takes less than a minute and the parts are dropped into an oil quench. The receivers are pulled from the quench by conveyor. After washing they are tempered in electric ovens to produce the final hardness. </p>
<p>Barrels start as lengths of solid bar 18 to 20 feet long of gun-barrel-quality special alloy steels (carbon and stainless alloys) fully heat-treated to finished specifications. All machining is performed on the barrels in its final heat-treated condition. This is important as heat-treating after machining could change critical dimensions and surface finish, resulting in a barrel that will never be capable of good accuracy.<br />
<a href="http://longrangeshooter.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/rifling_6rPoly.jpg"><img src="http://longrangeshooter.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/rifling_6rPoly-150x150.jpg" alt="" title="rifling_6rPoly" width="150" height="150" class="alignright size-thumbnail wp-image-667" /></a><br />
Some other makers use the hammer forge method that starts with a large diameter short bar of steel in its softest condition and a through hole larger than the chamber, which is then hammered over a mandrel tightly pushing the steel along the length of the barrel nearly doubling the length of the original blank.  The tricky part is relieving the stress and heat-treating without changing the inside shape, size and finish. Some target barrels made by this process leave the hammer marks on the exterior, as the maker wants to prevent changes to the bore that result from stress relieving by turning the outside diameter. </p>
<p>At Savage the bars are cut to lengths based on the finished barrel length desired on a lathe-type bar cutting machine, which provides an end with the smooth finish and perpendicularity required for gun-drilling. After gun-drilling, the blanks are reamed to final size and finish in multiple passes. The final size and finish must be held very close so that the button rifling process can create the rifled bore and grooves to the final dimensions. The rifling button is pulled through the bore and is rotated to match the twist on the grooves made in the button. The button forms the rifling by displacing material. No material is removed.  Next, the outside of the barrel is created concentric around the hole. This requires that the hole be straight and this is where the &#8220;art&#8221; in making barrels gets applied. It takes a lot of skill and years of experience to get consistent results. </p>
<p>The first step in the rifle&#8217;s assembly is called &#8220;swinging.&#8221; At this stage Savage assembles a receiver, barrel and bolt assembly and sandwich the recoil lug between the receiver and locknut. The barrel is screwed against the bolt with a &#8220;Minimum&#8221;headspace gage in the chamber to fit the headspace at dead &#8220;Minimum&#8221; with the bolt closed. The locknut is tightened with a torque wrench to secure the barrel.  Until this operation is completed it&#8217;s not known where the top of the barrel is going to be, which is why Savage strives to produce barrels with uniform concentricity.<br />
<a href="http://longrangeshooter.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/M4-3.jpg"><img src="http://longrangeshooter.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/M4-3-150x150.jpg" alt="" title="M4-3" width="150" height="150" class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-666" /></a><br />
Another important reason to have uniform concentricity is so the point of impact will not walk as the barrel heats up shot-to-shot. In this manner Savage can build rifle after rifle with minimum headspace. Other manufacturers assemble barrels and receivers and fit the bolt to the space that&#8217;s left so that it will close on a &#8220;go&#8221; gage and not close on the &#8220;no go&#8221; gage. Savage has assembled rifles with as little as .00125&#8243; difference between the &#8220;go&#8221; and &#8220;no go&#8221; gages. The Savage Model 110 bolt head is pinned to the bolt body, permitting a slight motion that ensures both lugs have full bearing on the locking surfaces in the receiver when the rifle is headspaced. This gives long life and aids accuracy. On most turnbolt actions, the bolt only contacts the receiver on a small part of the locking surface. This is why gunsmiths lap bolts before accurizing or fitting custom barrels. There is thus no need to lap the bolt and receiver of a Savage action to get full bearing. </p>
<p>Savage bolt assemblies provide for precision adjustment of firing pin protrusion and preload adjustment on the mainspring. This is performed on every bolt assembly, as it is built to minimize the stack-up of tolerances so that every rifle is fitted with an optimum bolt for uniform function. The Model 110 design has always achieved high ratings for short lock time and was listed in the top 10th percentile of all rifles rated in an independent study. The top of the receiver ring and bridge are tapped for scope mount bases. For the PNP-SAF model Savage installed a one-piece MIL-STD-1913 steel rail.<br />
<a href="http://longrangeshooter.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/savage110_2_PG.jpg"><img src="http://longrangeshooter.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/savage110_2_PG-150x150.jpg" alt="" title="savage110_2_PG" width="150" height="150" class="alignright size-thumbnail wp-image-663" /></a><br />
The receiver ring is about 1.6 inches in length. The Model 110 bridge, about 1.5 inches in length, is longer than that of most centerfire turnbolt actions. This added length provides support to the bolt when it&#8217;s drawn rearward so there is very little wobble or play at the end of the bolt stroke.  The Model 110 barrel has no reinforced shoulder however, about 1.5 inches of the barrel length is threaded and screwed into this is a contoured lock nut. The breechface of the barrel is counterbored for about .250&#8243;, and into this goes the head of the bolt. The bolt head is also recessed about .135&#8243; deep for the cartridge head. The recoil lug, a .150&#8243; thick steel stamping, is positioned over the barrel shank, between the receiver and barrel lock nut.<br />
<a href="http://longrangeshooter.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/10fcp5.jpg"><img src="http://longrangeshooter.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/10fcp5-150x150.jpg" alt="" title="10fcp5" width="150" height="150" class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-658" /></a><br />
The bolt and firing pin assembly look complicated, but were designed for ease of series production and assembly. Many of these components are investment castings. The bolt body is tube-shaped with the cocking-cam notch recess milled into it. The separate bolt head, with solid opposed locking lugs, attaches to the front end of the bolt body.  The C-type spring-clip extractor is attached over the rim of the bolt head recess on the front end of the bolt head. Lips on the interior ends of the extractor engage grooves cut into each side of the bolt head, and thus prevent the extractor from being pulled off the bolt head during the extraction process. The ejector is a spring-loaded plunger built into the breechface. </p>
<p>The Model 110 is well known for its unique front baffle, which aids in the control of escaping gas (from a ruptured primer or case) by blocking off the bolt raceway when the action is closed. Any gas escaping due to an ammunition failure that enters the bolt head is vented through a hole on the bottom of the bolt head that lines up with one of two gas port holes in the receiver when the bolt is in the locked position. The tear of the bolt assembly is sealed with an assembly bolt and the tear of the bolt raceways are blocked by a rear baffle.  The bolt handle is made as a separate component, its base surrounding the rear end of the bolt body. Two projections at the rear end of the bolt body, interfacing with two matching grooves inside the bolt collar, prevent the bolt handle from turning on the bolt. </p>
<p>A solid screw with a knurled head-called the bolt assembly screw-threads into the rear end of the bolt, retaining the bolt handle and sealing the bolt. Three ball-bearing plungers under the head of this bolt assembly screw, and notches at the tear of the bolt handle base, keep this screw from loosening once it has been tightened down. All of the law enforcement versions, such as the PNP-SAF model, feature larger, oversize bolt knobs.  The two locking lugs, engaging behind shoulders inside the receiver ring, secure the round inside the chamber. The root of the bolt handle, interfacing with a deep recess in the tang, serves as the third, or safety, locking lug. </p>
<p>The one-piece firing pin is exceptionally lightweight. The threaded front and rear ends of the striker body are milled flat for the entire length of the threads. The firing pin stop nut is threaded over the front end; in assembling the firing pin in the bolt body at the factory, the stop nut is rotated until the firing pin tip protrudes .060&#8243; when it&#8217;s resting on the rear of the bolt head. The rear end of this nut is notched, and a toothed washer-held in place by the mainspring-keeps the firing pin from turning and maintains a constant adjustment.  One of the most interesting features of the Savage Model 110 rifles, in all their many formats, is the AccuTrigger. The Savage AccuTrigger gives the operator the option to set trigger pull weights to his preference without the requirement of a gunsmith.</p>
<p>Even when adjusted to its lowest setting, the AccuTrigger is completely safe and cannot accidentally discharge during normal use by jarring or dropping. A newly designed teardrop safety is an additional feature on centerfire rifles with the AccuTrigger. It provides better acquisition of the safety button with smoother and quieter operation. The AccuTrigger is designed with an integrated AccuRelease that must be completely depressed or the rifle cannot fire. When pulling the trigger, the AccuRelease is intentionally depressed, which unblocks the sear and allows the rifle to discharge.<br />
<a href="http://longrangeshooter.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/image002.gif"><img src="http://longrangeshooter.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/image002-150x150.gif" alt="" title="image002" width="150" height="150" class="alignright size-thumbnail wp-image-660" /></a><br />
Adjustment of the AccuTrigger is quite simple. Remove the stock and rotate the return spring with the tool supplied. It cannot be adjusted below the minimum setting. Trigger pull weights on law enforcement models can be adjusted from 1 1/2 to 6 pounds. The rifle sent to us for test and evaluation was adjusted at the factory with a pull weight of exactly 1 1/2 pounds. </p>
<p><a href="http://longrangeshooter.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/10fcp7.jpg"><img src="http://longrangeshooter.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/10fcp7-150x150.jpg" alt="" title="10fcp7" width="150" height="150" class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-657" /></a><br />
This trigger safety is more than a little reminiscent of those found on the Glock and Springfield Armory XD pistols, which, in turn were taken from the Sauer Model 1930 caliber .32 ACP (7.65mm Browning) pistol, often designated as the Behorden Modell (Authorities Model).  In my opinion, sniper weapon systems, whether designed for law enforcement or military applications, should be equipped with a bipod, especially so when chambered for the heavier 7.62x51mm NATO cartridge and when deploying with heavy scopes of high magnification. </p>
<p>Savage Arms keep coming out with better and more accurate rifles and are quickly becoming the standard that all company&#8217;s will have to strive to achieve. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://longrangeshooter.com/2010/03/savage-arms-cutting-edge-sniper-weapon-system/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Benchmark Premium Rifle Test and Review</title>
		<link>http://longrangeshooter.com/2009/12/benchmark-premium-rifle-test-and-review/</link>
		<comments>http://longrangeshooter.com/2009/12/benchmark-premium-rifle-test-and-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Dec 2009 04:40:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lucas Beitner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Product Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[308 winchester]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[accuracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benchmark barrels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[competition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F class]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[long range rilfe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lucas Beitner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shooting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://longrangeshooter.com/?p=604</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I recently was given the opportunity to test a prototype &#8220;Benchmark Premium Rifle&#8221;. Benchmark barrels is likely to start building and selling complete rifles &#8220;ready to shoot&#8221;. Benchmark has been building and smithing rifles for their customers from the beginning, but there was no continuity in these builds and each was as individual as the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://longrangeshooter.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/007.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-608" src="http://longrangeshooter.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/007-600x450.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="225" /></a>I recently was given the opportunity to test a prototype &#8220;Benchmark Premium Rifle&#8221;. Benchmark barrels is likely to start building and selling complete rifles &#8220;ready to shoot&#8221;. Benchmark has been building and smithing rifles for their customers from the beginning, but there was no continuity in these builds and each was as individual as the customers themselves. This is a great service that will continue, but having custom rifles available in several configurations and options that are &#8220;range ready&#8221; has some serious appeal. I have used Benchmark&#8217;s barrels and consider them to be among the best available. I found it ironic (in a good way) that the test rifle was in 308 Winchester since I was considering building one for F-TR competition (a class restricted to 308 win and 223 rem). I&#8217;ve owned several 308&#8242;s in the past and had gravitated to using cartridges with superior ballistic performance. I always found the accuracy of the 308 to be very good. My 308&#8242;s regularly shot  ¼ MOA to 300yds and  ½ MOA at 500yds (I consider this to be solid accuracy). For an F-TR rifle, I would like to see  ¼ MOA capability to 500yds, as this would give an advantage over the majority of other rifles on the line. It&#8217;s allot to ask but I&#8217;ve got a couple other rifles that&#8217;ll do it (one of which has a Benchmark barrel)  so why not.</p>
<p><span lang="EN">The test rifle was designed to show case many of the options available and was made up of the following components </span></p>
<p>Benchmark stainless, 3-groove, 1:11 twist , 24&#8243;, fluted barrel, M40A1 contour with muzzle brake (5/8&#8243;x24tpi) thread protector included, chambered with 308 win. match spec reamer.</p>
<p>Lawton 7000 stainless action with chomolly bolt and Lawton 20 MOA scope base.</p>
<p>The pillar and recoil lug areas are bedded with titanium devcon, and skim bedded with marine tex.</p>
<p>McMillan A5 stock with saddle cheek piece</p>
<p>Jewel trigger adjustable from 3 oz. to 1 lbs. (I found it to be very nicely tuned when testing)</p>
<p>Badger M5 DBM with 5 round mag. (added after my testing)</p>
<p>Guarantee:  ½ MOA at 500yds (3 shots) with hand loads.</p>
<p>The rifle came in around 12.5 pounds without scope and bipod.</p>
<p>The tentative price the rifle would be $3,829 (with the above options) which is very competitive with rifles built with similar components. Many I looked at where just over $4000 with similar options.  Benchmark&#8217;s rifles would also include a guarantee of  ½ MOA guarantee (for 3 shots) at 500yds with hand loads (no bench rest match prepping required, just quality components in consistent proportions). It&#8217;s not uncommon to have 100yd accuracy guarantee with factory ammo, I think this is a good thing, but most who buy rifles like this aren&#8217;t shooting factory ammo anyway. Law enforcement and military are another animal altogether, but the Jewel trigger leads me to believe this rifle is directed more toward the competition (long range tactical and F-class alike) market anyway.</p>
<p>When I first took the rifle I was immediately struck by how solid and quality the Lawton action felt. It compared very favorably to a Phoenix action that I currently own. After looking it over, working the action, and dry firing a few times I had a very good feeling about this rifle. I took it home an mounted my loaner scope, a Bushnell 4200 6-24&#215;50 Tactical (I mounted my Nightforce  for pictures). It&#8217;s not as nice as my other scopes but it has worked flawlessly since I got it. I wouldn&#8217;t be able to blame any &#8220;accuracy issues&#8221; on the scope. I normally avoid public shooting ranges like the plague but I didn&#8217;t have time to get out to one of my own &#8220;shooting spots&#8221; for barrel break in. I&#8217;m not personally sold on the &#8220;proper barrel break in procedure&#8221; but since I can&#8217;t afford to purchase this rife myself. I judiciously, fired and cleaned, fired and cleaned until there was very little fouling. I was provided some surplus ammo (mixed head stamps) for this process. I did shoot some groups for accuracy and separated head stamps as best I could. Some of the groups weren&#8217;t incredibly impressive (no doubt there was some human error, but it&#8217;s safe to say I could hold tighter than the surplus ammo would shoot). One head stamp though, &#8220;FN 70&#8243; shot very well with a best 3 shot group of .271&#8243;. <a href="http://longrangeshooter.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/016.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-606" src="http://longrangeshooter.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/016-600x450.jpg" alt="" width="400" height="325" /></a>Nearly  ¼ MOA with this ammo is pretty darn good in my opinion. Another shooter provided me with 3 rounds of 168gr GMM  free of charge if I could squeeze them into less than  ½ inch outside to outside. The rifle liked this ammo just fine, as the group was .091&#8243; center to center. I took the rifle home for a thorough cleaning and found it cleaned up very easily, something I expected since it&#8217;s not my first Benchmark barrel.</p>
<p>The very next weekend I had planned to go with some buddies on a long range shooting trip. I knew this would be my best opportunity to test the rifle at 500yds. Benchmark didn&#8217;t give me any demands about my testing, so I selfishly based everything on my goals for an F-TR rifle mentioned previously. I didn&#8217;t have as much 308 Lapua brass as I had remembered, and realized it wouldn&#8217;t be possible to test many different loads. I tried to bribe some buddies to test my loads at 300yds during the week, so I&#8217;d know which to bring for 500yd testing, but I guess I&#8217;m not particularly persuasive. I had 3 different loads (45gr, 45.5gr and 46gr of powder) all with the following components:</p>
<p>Lapua unfired brass</p>
<p>CCI BR-2 primers</p>
<p>Hodgdon Varget powder</p>
<p>Sierra 155gr HPBT &#8220;palma&#8221; bullets</p>
<p>OAL: 2.825&#8243; (average)</p>
<p>I did no bullet separation by o-give, weight, etc. Cases were not trimmed, or measured for capacity, powder charges are as close as I could get them with my RCBS beam scale. It wasn&#8217;t exactly fair to expect much since I had done absolutely zero load development. I had used these same components with very favorable results in 308&#8242;s I&#8217;d owned previously. More importantly though  These are the components I&#8217;d plan to use in an F-TR rifle (I&#8217;d also look into the 155.5gr Berger BT).</p>
<p>The weekend couldn&#8217;t have come fast enough. It was very cold in my buddy&#8217;s shooting area (in the 20&#8242;s), I was glad he brought a trailer for us to sleep in even though it wasn&#8217;t heated. The next morning we drove out and set up our targets. A 14&#8243;x12&#8243; steel plate, prairie dog silhouette and clay pigeons at 975yds. Those targets seemed to be calling the Benchmark 308 tucked safely away in the case but I simply didn&#8217;t have enough ammo and needed results on paper. Later we moved to a spot where we set up clay pigeons at 500 and 650yds. Of course I also put paper targets up at 500yds for testing purposes. By this time it had warmed up a bit, probably into the low-mid 30&#8242;s but, I&#8217;m pretty sure the ground was still frozen! There was a little wind, mostly into our face (zero value). I started out with the 45gr load, shooting a couple fowlers, and getting dialed close enough to keep the groups on paper. I repeated the process with the 45.5gr and 46gr loads (minus fowlers obviously) . The rifle clearly liked the 45gr load best with a 3 shot group (of 3 total) of 1.644&#8243; center to center. This is just .336&#8243; over the  ¼ MOA mark and .319&#8243; under the 3/8 MOA mark. <a href="http://longrangeshooter.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/014.jpg"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-607" src="http://longrangeshooter.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/014-600x450.jpg" alt="" width="400" height="325" /></a>The group strung horizontally with vertical dispersion of just .494&#8243; which is 0.16&#8243; under 1/8 MOA of vertical dispersion for 3 shots. The 46gr load wasn&#8217;t too shabby either at under  ½ MOA. The testing was all done from the prone position using a bipod, and rear sand sock. I can only hold so tight, but if I had the opportunity to shoot more than one group with the 45gr load I&#8217;m fairly confident it could get even better for 3 shots. Most impressive to myself is the fact that there was no load development done with this rifle. Perhaps I lucked out and the 45gr of Varget is optimal, but I&#8217;d bet one could tune the seating depth to further enhance accuracy even thought the SMK&#8217;s don&#8217;tâ€˜ seem to be very jump/jam sensitive.</p>
<p>I gave the rifle back the same day I tested it at 500yds. It did hurt a little, handing the rifle over along with the 500yd target, but I think I hid it very well. I&#8217;d found and shot an ideal F-TR class competition rifle. With the vertical dispersion it displayed, I feel confident in assuming this rifle is true  ¼ MOA capable at 500yds. All the more so, as the testing was from a bi-pod, in less than user friendly conditions. It is very likely I&#8217;ll be talking to Benchmark about building another 308 in the near future.</p>
<p>Lucas Beitner</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://longrangeshooter.com/2009/12/benchmark-premium-rifle-test-and-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ballistic Software Comparison: Nightforce Exbal vs Lex Talus Delta IV</title>
		<link>http://longrangeshooter.com/2009/11/ballistic-software-comparison-nightforce-x-ball-lex-talus-delta-iv/</link>
		<comments>http://longrangeshooter.com/2009/11/ballistic-software-comparison-nightforce-x-ball-lex-talus-delta-iv/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 04:07:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lucas Beitner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Product Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[243]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[308]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[338 Laupa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[7wsm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[accuracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ballistic program]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ballistics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delta IV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lex Talus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[long range]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lucas Beitner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nightforce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shooting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[X-ball]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://longrangeshooter.com/?p=557</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The key to shooting long range with accuracy is knowing and compensating for ballistics. Ballistics programs allow you to input your specific load information (most importantly bullet ballistic coefficient and muzzle velocity) and atmospheric conditions and then, provide you with a predicted flight path. Any experienced long range marksman will know that these predictions are [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://longrangeshooter.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/home_r1_c1.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-586" src="http://longrangeshooter.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/home_r1_c1-600x224.jpg" alt="" width="600" height="224" /></a></p>
<p>The key to shooting long range with accuracy is knowing and compensating for ballistics. Ballistics programs allow you to input your specific load information (most importantly bullet ballistic coefficient and muzzle velocity) and atmospheric conditions and then, provide you with a predicted flight path. Any experienced long range marksman will know that these predictions are often very close at closer ranges (usually out to about 500yds) and usually not so close at longer ranges. Ballistic coefficients are speed dependant because they are based off a given profile, the G1 profile being the most common. If your bullet were a perfect match to the G1 profile your BC would remain the same despite the velocity. The variance with speed is so great because the G1 profile is nothing close to the profile of long range low-drag, boat-tail, bullets most popular today. The problem is well known and the better ballistic programs have compensated for this issue to some degree.</p>
<p>I have been using the <a href="http://www.perry-systems.com/">Nightforce Exbal</a> program for some time and I&#8217;m very happy with it. It has allowed me to make a few cold-bore shots at extreme distances that I wouldn&#8217;t otherwise be capable. I can get information on how changing atmospheric conditions will effect my dope (data on previous engagement). I have this program loaded into a palm pilot that I can use in the field (although I&#8217;m never without a written drop chart for obvious reasons). Other features include trajectory validation, point blank range analysis, target engagement, factory load data, bullet BC data, reticle analysis, scope adjustment options, target distance estimation, etc. It&#8217;s safe to say I&#8217;ve got my money&#8217;s worth from the Exbal program. With such a comprehensive program you might wonder how Exbal compensates for inaccuracies of BC&#8217;s changing  with speed. They have included a multi-BC option where one can enter 5 different BC&#8217;s at 4 specific velocities (last velocity value must be at zero). This allows you to tailor your BC to match your confirmed drops in the field. Sierra Bullets provides multiple BC&#8217;s and using these will allow you to get very good data from the program right from the start. Unfortunately most bullet manufacturers don&#8217;t give multiple speed dependant BC&#8217;s. Obviously bullet BC&#8217;s don&#8217;t change suddenly at a specific velocity, so multiple BC&#8217;s isn&#8217;t a perfect fix, simply a compromise. Even so, I&#8217;ve found it possible to get an essentially perfect drop chart using the multiple BC option. When using bullets without published speed dependant BC&#8217;s you&#8217;ll be spending some time playing with the program to get your drop chart just right. It usually takes more than one long range shooting session to get everything just right.</p>
<p>Thanks to Sean (host of <a href="http://longrangeshooter.com">longrangeshooter.com</a>) I recently had the opportunity to test the <a href="http://www.precisionworkbench.com/">Lex Talus Delta IV ballistic program</a>. Completely satisfied and very familiar with Exbal, I was honestly expecting just another ballistic program. It doesn&#8217;t take long to notice a difference when inputting basic data. When using standard G1 BC&#8217;s you will get drop charts much closer to actual numbers than with other ballistic programs. This is due to the type of compensation Delta IV uses for BC variation with velocity. They label it &#8220;DK&#8221; which is a way of calibrating BC degradation and they also claim it can be used to compensate for shooter to shooter variances in launch dynamics. I must say that the default DK settings gives me very close drop info compared with my confirmed data. I&#8217;ve found that adjusting the DK (and BC if  advertised BC is off)  is easier to get &#8220;perfect&#8221; drops compared with the adjustment of multiple BC&#8217;s and the velocities at which those BC&#8217;s &#8220;change&#8221;. Delta IV includes all of the options of the Exbal program mentioned above. One option of Delta missing with Exbal is the powder temperature (ammo temp). You can adjust how sensitive your powder is to temperature. I gravitate to using powders that are not particularly sensitive to temperature. I have a reasonably wide range of temperatures where my drop charts will allow hits on reasonably small targets, but there&#8217;s no getting around changes in MV due to temperature. In one competition a couple years ago, the temperature rose to over 100 degrees and I quickly discovered I was missing high. My &#8220;temperature insensitive&#8221; loads had lulled me into a false sense of security. If only I had been using Delta IV back then! Having this option will allow you to get very accurate drops even when out of your normal temperature range.</p>
<p>To compare these programs I did a few tests. I have some confirmed drops for a couple different rifles. I decided to input &#8220;standard&#8221; BC info (only data that&#8217;s readily available), no multiple BC&#8217;s except for Sierra bullets. I only used the default DK for Delta IV. Either program can be adjusted to match your tested drops. Obviously, I made all the elevation, atmospheric/scope height data the same. I think  these examples  give a good basic idea of the program capabilities. Before I get into all the specifics let me just say that there are numerous reasons this test isn&#8217;t a perfect comparison including: operator error (in using the programs and/or shooting the rifles) imperfections in my confirmed drops, difference in actual MV and measured MV, error in atmospheric condition and elevation data, group dispersion, scope calibration error (I check mine but when you dial over 50 MOA a small error will show up in drop chart data), bullet manufacturer BC inaccuracy, etc.</p>
<p>Test 1) 7wsm 168gr JLK @ 2910fps  Advertised BC .690</p>
<p>500yds Actual drop 8.25 MOA                                     1000yds Actual drop 24.50 MOA</p>
<p>500yds Exbal projected drop 8.00 MOA       1000yds Exbal projected drop 23.25</p>
<p>500yds Delta projected drop 8.25 MOA           1000yds Delta projected drop 24.25</p>
<p>This test was not exactly fair to either program since the advertised BC of this JLK bullet is too high in my opinion. Delta was still very close!</p>
<p>Test 2) 243 win 108gr Berger BT @ 2912&#8230; Advertised BC .511</p>
<p>500yds Actual Drop 8.50 MOA                   1000yds Actual Drop 27.75</p>
<p>500yds Exbal projected drop 8.50      1000yds Exbal projected drop 27.00</p>
<p>500yds Delta projected drop 8.50       1000yds Delta projected drop 28.25</p>
<p>Test 3) 308 win 175gr SMK @ 2729&#8230; Advertised BC&#8217;s .505 (2800fps+) .496 (1800-2800fps) .485 (1800fps-)</p>
<p>500yds Actual Drop 10.25 MOA                                     1000yds Actual Drop 32.75</p>
<p>500yds Exbal projected drop 10.00 MOA       1000yds Exbal projected drop 32.00 MOA</p>
<p>500yds Delta projected drop 10.75                           1000yds Delta projected drop 34.00 M0A</p>
<p>This test illustrates how the Exbal program works with multiple BC&#8217;s.</p>
<p>Test 4) 338 Lapua Mag 245gr Bore Tech V3 @ 2895&#8230; Advertised BC .869</p>
<p>500yds Actual Drop 7.25 MOA                 1000yds Actual Drop 22.00</p>
<p>500yds Exbal projected drop 7.25    1000yds Exbal projected drop 21.50</p>
<p>500yds Delta projected drop 7.25       1000yds  Delta projected drop 21.75</p>
<p>1850yds Actual Drop 58.00</p>
<p>1850yds Exbal projected drop 59.00</p>
<p>1850yds Delta IV projected drop 57.75</p>
<p>This one is truly amazing. Delta was within  ¼ MOA at over a mile! I wouldn&#8217;t have imagined this was possible. Now the info after using Delta IV&#8217;s DK calculating option  which gives me a new DK of .4992 new drop info was</p>
<p>500yds 7.25 MOA</p>
<p>1000yds 22.00 MOA</p>
<p>1850yds 58.00 MOA</p>
<p>A quick and simple step (DK calculation) gives me an essentially perfect drop chart not just at 500yds (most on-line ballistic calculators could do that) but spot on at 1000yds and 1850yds! To say that I&#8217;m impressed with Delta IV would be an understatement.</p>
<p>Lucas Beitner</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://longrangeshooter.com/2009/11/ballistic-software-comparison-nightforce-x-ball-lex-talus-delta-iv/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Factory vs. Custom Rifles</title>
		<link>http://longrangeshooter.com/2009/01/factory-vs-custom-rifles/</link>
		<comments>http://longrangeshooter.com/2009/01/factory-vs-custom-rifles/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 07:42:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lucas Beitner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[accuracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[custom reamer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[custom rifle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[factory rifle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[long range]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lucas Beitner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[remington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rifle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sako]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[savage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shooting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tika]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://longrangeshooter.com/?p=458</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Factory vs. Custom Rifles by Lucas Beitner   When getting involved in long range shooting, rifle selection can be difficult. There are so many different manufactures, cartridges, and configurations available. Many would like a custom built rifle, but wonder if it&#8217;s worth the extra time and cost. The answer depends mostly on your priorities, and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Factory vs. Custom Rifles<br />
</strong>by Lucas Beitner</p>
<p><strong><a href="http://longrangeshooter.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/012-copy3.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-473" src="http://longrangeshooter.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/012-copy3-600x380.jpg" alt="" width="600" height="380" /></a></strong></p>
<p>  <br />
When getting involved in long range shooting, rifle selection can be difficult. There are so many different manufactures, cartridges, and configurations available. Many would like a custom built rifle, but wonder if it&#8217;s worth the extra time and cost. The answer depends mostly on your priorities, and needs. There are advantages for each. Here&#8217;s a quick overview.</p>
<p><strong>Factory Rifles</strong></p>
<p>Factory rifles can be anything from the awesome Sako TRG to the cheap Savage Stevens. Factory rifles can be purchased in many different cartridges and calibers. The accuracy ranges from excellent to unacceptable (for long range). If you have the ability to do a little research, you can avoid any that have a high probability of poor accuracy. You can also find some where good accuracy is the rule rather than the exception. Factory rifles come ready to fire. You can get them from a local shop in minuets or have one shipped in days. You&#8217;ll have little down time especially if you have optics ready to go. There are custom rifles that will take over a year to get once you order!</p>
<p>A reasonably priced factory rifle can have good accuracy even for long range. I&#8217;ve  owned a factory rifle that shot with accuracy above the level of many customs. This is the exception and not the rule, but it&#8217;s a joy to find and shoot such a rifle. Some factory rifles come with accuracy guarantees, but most do not. If you purchase a rifle that shoots poorly there are modifications (at relatively little cost) that you can make to increase accuracy. It is possible to get one that cannot be made to shoot with acceptable accuracy. The worst case scenario, would have you ordering a new barrel and action work from your gun smith. This extreme would be very rare, and one should not be worried. I&#8217;ve heard of plenty who get the factory to fix rifles that shot poorly  even when no guarantee of accuracy was made.</p>
<p>There are many options available for factory rifles. They will often have different magazine configurations (or lack thereof). Different barrel contours and lengths&#8230; heavy barrels for varmint and tactical models, helping dissipate heat and maintain accuracy for extended strings of shooting. Light barrels are most popular for hunting models, keeping weight to a minimum. They can be made  from different materials including chromoly, stainless, even titanium. Some will have synthetic stocks, some wood. Even factory rifles designed for accuracy will often have aluminum pillars or bedding blocks. Some will have stocks that are adjustable, but most will not. The choices you will have to make for selecting a factory rifle are generally very straight forward.</p>
<p>Factory rifles are generally less expensive than customs. Good shooting rifles will sell for as little as $400. The used market can be great way to save even more. Make sure you know what a rifle goes for new. Just because it&#8217;s at a pawn shop doesn&#8217;t mean it&#8217;s a good deal. If you order a rifle off the internet keep in mind you&#8217;ll have to pay a local FFL for transfer. This usually runs about $40 in my area. A budget minded shooter will often purchase a factory rifle and slowly make modifications over time. Doing this can be enjoyable especially if you see better accuracy as a result of your own work. When a barrel is shot out on a factory rifle, a custom can be built from it.</p>
<p><strong>Custom Rifles</strong></p>
<p>Custom rifles can be had in every configuration imaginable. Any cartridge can be used from a standard 308 to a custom wild cat. You can build a single shot or repeater. Left hand, Right hand, left port, right port. It can be built from a factory action you are familiar with, or a custom action of extremely close tolerances. It can take a great deal of time and research to decide what suits you.</p>
<p>The accuracy of custom rifles is generally much better than factory. Accuracy guarantees are not uncommon. Not all custom rifles are created equally. If you&#8217;re going to spend the money, make sure you know what you&#8217;re getting. Find out what experiences others are having with customs from the same smith or company. Amazingly there are custom rifle makers who consider MOA accuracy to be excellent.</p>
<p>Custom rifles will require some decision making not necessary with factory rifles. Perhaps you will be selecting each component individually and paying a smith you know is good to assemble a rifle you&#8217;ve designed. If you allow your smith to decide what&#8217;s best, make sure you know what you&#8217;re getting. If you have any concerns let them know before your rifle is built. If you have questions&#8230;.ask, this is part of what you&#8217;re paying for. With the advise of your smith, it&#8217;s probably best that you make most of the decisions. You&#8217;ll have to decide what cartridge, action, barrel, stock, trigger, etc. It&#8217;s best to keep in mind the purposes of this rifle.</p>
<p>When you decide what cartridge and caliber best suit your purposes it would also be good to decide what bullets you would be using. Find out what twist rate is required to stabilize the bullets you plan to use and order your barrel accordingly. If your rifle will be a repeater make sure the reamer is throated so you can seat the bullets into the lands without exceeding the   mag length. By the same token if you have room in the mag, a reamer that allows you to seat the bullets near maximum mag length will give maximum capacity for powder. This can net a little more muzzle velocity which is generally a good thing!</p>
<p>Length of barrel is another consideration. For large magnums shooting heavy bullets long barrels will allow best velocities with slow burning powders. Some cartridges suffer little loss of velocity when used with short barrels, particularly those using relatively fast burning powders. Of course, if you will be dragging this rifle through the hills a long barrel may be out of the question. How about your trigger? Even a good rifle&#8217;s accuracy can be spoiled by a poor trigger. The trigger on a custom rifle should be tuned for a crisp brake and minimal over-travel. The weight of the trigger is up to the shooter. If the cross-hairs routinely move when you pull the trigger it may be to heavy (or poor shooting technique).Only you can decide whats best for you&#8230; that&#8217;s why you&#8217;re building a custom in first place.</p>
<p>Make sure the components come together in a rifle that will be comfortable for you. You&#8217;ll likely be spending more money than most &#8220;off the shelf&#8221; rifles require and you want to get your money&#8217;s worth. If at all possible handle the stock you want to use before you purchase. If the stock does not fit you correctly (and cannot be adjusted), shooting your rifle could be frustrating. Don&#8217;t leave anything out. With careful research and consideration you can build a custom rifle that will meet your needs and expectations. Such a rifle is always a pleasure to shoot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://longrangeshooter.com/2009/01/factory-vs-custom-rifles/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gun Powder</title>
		<link>http://longrangeshooter.com/2009/01/gun-powder/</link>
		<comments>http://longrangeshooter.com/2009/01/gun-powder/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 04:34:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean Pomerinke</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gun powder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hodgdon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[long range shooting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[powder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sharp shooter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shooting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sniper]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://longrangeshooter.com/?p=428</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Our mission is to provide quality propellants, other products, and services to sportsmen, governing units, and other businesses in a manner which enhances the quality of life for our stockholders, employees, customers, associates, and suppliers. In doing so, we will deal with integrity and honesty, reflecting that people are more important than dollars and that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://longrangeshooter.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/hodgdon_products.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-429" title="hodgdon_products" src="http://longrangeshooter.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/hodgdon_products-600x263.jpg" alt="" width="600" height="263" /></a></p>
<p><strong>Our mission</strong> is to provide quality propellants, other products, and services to sportsmen, governing units, and other businesses in a manner which enhances the quality of life for our stockholders, employees, customers, associates, and suppliers. In doing so, we will deal with integrity and honesty, reflecting that people are more important than dollars and that our purpose is to bring credit to our Lord Jesus Christ.</p>
<p><a href="http://longrangeshooter.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/bruce-hodgdon.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-432" title="bruce-hodgdon" src="http://longrangeshooter.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/bruce-hodgdon.jpg" alt="" width="224" height="380" /></a><br />
Success in the American tradition demands the qualities of motivation, determination, willingness to sacrifice, hard work, timing and a true element of luck. Even in our modern times of high taxation, escalating costs, and governmental regulation, it is still possible for the &#8220;common man&#8221; to become successful if he has a good idea and most or all of these qualities.</p>
<p>The <a href="http://www.hodgdon.com/index.html">Hodgdon</a> Companies, as they exist today, are an example of this tradition. Until he began the surplus powder business, Bruce <a href="http://www.hodgdon.com/index.html">Hodgdon</a> was a salesman for the Gas Service Company, traveling local territory selling gas appliances. From a few dollars borrowed on the cash value of his life insurance policy has evolved a manufacturing and distributing company that has customers in all 50 states and many foreign countries.</p>
<p>All his life Bruce <a href="http://www.hodgdon.com/index.html">Hodgdon</a> was interested in shooting, hunting, and reloading. He custom-loaded ammunition for friends during World War II while he was in the Navy and after, while working full time as a salesman for the Gas Service Company. Somewhere Bruce had heard that the government burned huge stocks of surplus powder after WWI because of the lack of market for them, and he figured that the same would be true after hostilities ended in 1945.</p>
<p>Even though he had no place to store gunpowder, and did not know if enough shooters would gamble to purchase unknown types of propellant, Bruce cut government red tape and soon owned 50,000 pounds of government surplus 4895. An old boxcar moved to a rented farm pasture served as the first magazine, the first one-inch ad placed in the American Rifleman, and Bruce was in business.</p>
<p>The first 150-pound kegs of powder sold for $30.00 each plus freight! Early shipments also consisted of metal cans with hand-glued labels sent out in wooden boxes made from orange crates and sawed on a homemade circle saw by Bruce and his grade-school age boys, J. B. and Bob. A little later, the boys delivered shipments to the REA or the Merriam Frisco train terminal each morning on their way to high school. The trunk of the family 1940 Ford served as carrier for hundreds of thousands of pounds of powder during this time. Bruce&#8217;s Wife Amy served as bookkeeper and saleswoman. Very quickly mail order sales grew to include other reloading components, tools, and finally firearms and ammunition.</p>
<p>In 1952 Bruce resigned from the Gas Service Company and B. E. <a href="http://www.hodgdon.com/index.html">Hodgdon</a>, Incorporated, was officially underway. J.B. and Bob entered the business full time after graduating from college in 1959 and 1961. After considerable expansion in the 1960s, it became apparent that splitting the wholesale firearm business from the nationwide powder business would save confusion among customers and facilitate bookkeeping. <a href="http://www.hodgdon.com/index.html">Hodgdon</a> Powder Company came into being in 1966 as a result. Eventually, the wholesale firearms company was sold in 1984.</p>
<p>If it were not for the efforts of a handful of men seeing that changes were made, shooters all over the country would now have much greater difficulty obtaining their powders. In 1963 and 1964, Bruce <a href="http://www.hodgdon.com/index.html">Hodgdon</a>, Ted Curtis, Homer Clark of the Alcan Company, and Dave Wolfe of Wolfe Publishing Company, were successful in persuading the ICC â€“ now the DOT â€“ through exhaustive tests by the Bureau of Explosives to downgrade certain packages of smokeless powder to the much-easier-to-ship &#8220;1.4C â€“ Flammable Solid&#8221; Classification. As a result, containers under 8 lbs. each and in approved packages of shipments weighing less than 100 net pounds can today be handled by any common carrier, including UPS and FedEx. Previous to this, all Smokeless powders were considered &#8220;Class B explosives&#8221; for shipping purposes, which is nearly as restrictive as the almost impossible task of transporting black powder.</p>
<p>In 1967, the <a href="http://www.hodgdon.com/index.html">Hodgdon&#8217;s</a> built what was then billed as &#8220;the world&#8217;s largest indoor shooting range,&#8221; an indoor structure allowing 44 shooters to share a 25 Yard range at the same time. This range and store is open to the public at 6201 Robinson, Overland Park, Kansas (www.thebullethole.com). Although this business was sold to outside parties in November 1982, we invite any of our nationwide customers to visit when in the Kansas City area.</p>
<p>Bruce <a href="http://www.hodgdon.com/index.html">Hodgdon</a> passed away in 1997. Bruce was among other things an avid reloader, competitive rifle shooter, trap shooter, hunter, NRA Benefactor Member, and World War II Veteran. The industry honored Bruce for his contributions to the shooting sports in 1995/1996 with the Shooting Academy Award of Excellence. The company is now in the hands of J.B. and Bob <a href="http://www.hodgdon.com/index.html">Hodgdon</a>, the two grade school boys back in the late 1940&#8242;s, who worked hand in hand with their father to establish and grow this company.</p>
<p>Today, <a href="http://www.hodgdon.com/index.html">Hodgdon</a> smokeless propellants are developed and manufactured to meet the needs of every reloader. The powder that started Bruce <a href="http://www.hodgdon.com/index.html">Hodgdon&#8217;s</a> business, H4895, is still produced and sold along with world-class powders available for just about any Rifle, Handgun, and Shotshell load.</p>
<p>Smokeless propellants are only half of the famous <a href="http://www.hodgdon.com/index.html">Hodgdon</a> story. Muzzleloading shooters and hunters around the world recognize <a href="http://www.hodgdon.com/index.html">Hodgdon</a> as the company that makes the best performing, most convenient, safest, and easy to clean black powder substitute propellants. Pyrodex ®, introduced in 1976, is the most successful black powder substitute on the market. Pyrodex products are safer, cleaner burning and produces 30% more shots per pound than common black powder. Pyrodex also makes it easier to clean the gun after shooting.</p>
<p>Innovation is a key part of <a href="http://www.hodgdon.com/index.html">Hodgdon&#8217;s</a> philosophy and values. The patented Pyrodex Pellets give the modern muzzleloader speed and safety in a convenient preformed charge. They offer quick and safe no-spill loading, instant ignition, and faster second shots.</p>
<p>Always looking to the future, <a href="http://www.hodgdon.com/index.html">Hodgdon</a> took muzzleloading to the next millennium with Triple Seven ® muzzleloading Pellets and granular propellants. Introduced in 2001, Triple Seven has proven to be very consistent and accurate but is most recognized for its easy water clean up and no sulfur (rotten egg) smell! In 2007, Triple Seven Magnums were introduced. Magnums deliver higher energy for serious hunting knock down power.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.hodgdon.com/index.html">Hodgdon</a> Powder Company offices are located at 6231 Robinson in Overland Park, Kansas (even though the mailing address is Shawnee Mission, the destination of the central post office). The Powder magazine, packaging and manufacturing facilities are maintained about 140 miles southwest of the main office, in Herington, Kansas. Additional magazine space, located on a closed military base, is also leased from the City of Topeka, Kansas.</p>
<p>To better serve our reloading customers <a href="http://www.hodgdon.com/index.html">Hodgdon</a> Powder Company continues to grow. <a href="http://www.hodgdon.com/index.html">Hodgdon</a> purchased IMR ® Powder Company in October 2003. IMR legendary powders have been the mainstay of numerous handloaders for almost 100 years. IMR powders continue to be manufactured in the same plant and with the same exacting performance criteria and quality assurance standards that shooters have come to expect.</p>
<p>In March 2006, <a href="http://www.hodgdon.com/index.html">Hodgdon</a> Powder Company and Winchester ® Ammunition announced that Winchester ® branded reloading powders would be licensed to <a href="http://www.hodgdon.com/index.html">Hodgdon</a>. Winchester smokeless propellants, the choice of loading professionals, are available to the handloader to duplicate the factory performance of loads from handgun to rifle and shotgun.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.hodgdon.com/index.html">Hodgdon</a>, IMR and Winchester smokeless propellants continue to introduce many new, innovative, technologically advanced and unique propellants to the marketplace. Today, as over the last sixty years, the success of the <a href="http://www.hodgdon.com/index.html">Hodgdon</a> Companies depends upon the good will and satisfaction of our loyal customers. Thank you for the trust you continue to give our products; we only hope that they are a part of the reason you enjoy your chosen sport of hunting or shooting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://longrangeshooter.com/2009/01/gun-powder/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

